{"id":43373,"date":"2024-01-24T12:22:48","date_gmt":"2024-01-24T17:22:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/allianceadvisors.com\/blackrock-fidelity-calstrs-update-proxy-voting-guidelines-for-2024\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T17:50:29","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T21:50:29","slug":"blackrock-fidelity-calstrs-update-proxy-voting-guidelines-for-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/allianceadvisors.com\/fr\/blackrock-fidelity-calstrs-update-proxy-voting-guidelines-for-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"BlackRock, Fidelity, CalSTRS Update Proxy Voting Guidelines for 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css= » »]As the 2024 proxy season gets underway, various institutional investors are releasing updates to their U.S. proxy voting guidelines<\/a>. In early January, BlackRock, Fidelity Investments and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) publicized their changes, as described below.\n

Notably, both BlackRock and Fidelity highlighted their antipathy towards shareholder proposals that are unduly prescriptive or constraining on management. BlackRock also tempered its policies regarding the consideration of key stakeholder interests; steps undertaken to advance diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI); and plans to transition to global net-zero emissions. In view of the restrained nature of these updates — along with the absence of any material changes by Institutional Shareholder<\/a> Services (ISS) — environmental and social (E&S) resolutions are unlikely to see any improvement in average support this season after two consecutive years of decline.<\/p>\n

BlackRock<\/span><\/h2>\n

BlackRock made few significant changes to its 2024 voting policies. For the most part, it is showing issuers more flexibility regarding human capital management (HCM) practices, stakeholder interests, and climate transition plans, while providing a more detailed discussion on how it evaluates shareholder proposals<\/a>.<\/p>\n